07 October 2010 “Cleaned” beaches still unsafe for Gulf wildlife Posted by: Caitlin Leutwiler | 4 comments | Share: Oil may not be washing upon the shores of the Gulf in vast slicks, but that doesn’t mean it’s disappeared. Here, Defenders’ own Tim Male holds solid proof in his hands that oil remains a part of Louisiana beaches used by people and wildlife alike. As tar balls such as these continue to float in from the ocean, they’re still a threat to imperiled Gulf species like Kemp’s ridley sea turtles and brown pelicans that depend on a healthy marine ecosystem to survive. For example, if sea turtles ingest even small amounts of oil from the water or their food, over time, it can accumulate in their bodies and harm or kill them. Tim’s “big ol’ patty of tar” is a dark reminder that the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster is far from over – and efforts to restore and rehabilitate the Gulf of Mexico have only just begun. Click here to see what you can do to help wildlife that continues to be impacted by oil in Gulf waters, and prevent a tragedy like this from ever happening again. 4 Responses to ““Cleaned” beaches still unsafe for Gulf wildlife” Abbi October 7th, 2010 Isn’t tar a natural occurrence on the ocean? Abbi October 7th, 2010 In* the ocean Caitlin Leutwiler October 19th, 2010 Good question Abbi – here’s an answer from our resident offshore drilling expert, Richard Charter: “It is true that some specific areas of the ocean have slow natural seeps of tar oozing from the ocean floor. Some of the marine life in these areas has generally adapted over eons of time to low levels of pollution, with sensitive species no longer present, and species more tolerant of oil pollution continuing to colonize near these areas. The resulting thin films of surface oil “sheen” from natural seeps, however, are not the same in terms of impacts on animals, fish, and birds as the heavy lenses and “tarmats” and “tarballs” that accompany major releases of oil from an oil rig blowout or a tanker or barge spill. Heavier oil deposits gum up the feathers of birds and the fur of some marine mammals, poisoning the animal as it tries to clean itself and ingests the oil, or preventing the animal from being able to insulate itself from the ocean waters, so it dies of hypothermia.” Post Your Comment Click here to cancel reply. Name (required) Mail (required) (will not be published) You May also be interested in Wolf Weekly Wrap-Up Helicopter gunning kills 23 wolves in Idaho; Urge Secretary Jewell to abandon gray wolf delisting proposal — Call your representative by March 14; Washington wildlife agency urged to end support for abolishing federal wolf protections; The latest on Governor Otter’s wolf control board. Two Too Many Development Projects in the Ivanpah Valley While these projects most definitely directly impact a species that has been identified as threatened and is dependent on the habitat where they would be built, Silver State South and Stateline’s approval is most troubling for a bigger reason. You see, this isn’t just an issue for the Ivanpah Valley. Developers and agencies need to be conscious of how and where they plan energy projects all across the country. They need to look at renewable energy planning with a landscape-wide lens, understanding that building in the right places and making an effort to minimize environmental impacts from the start are essential. California’s Rim Fire: Opportunities Rise from the Ashes After California’s devastating Rim Fire, will officials take the opportunity to give nature a chance to fully recover?