16 June 2011 BREAKING: Congress Votes Against Protecting Farms, Forests Posted by: Noah Matson | 4 comments | Share: In a disturbing trend of attacking the government’s ability to prepare for climate risks, the House passed an amendment to the fiscal 2012 agriculture spending bill that would prohibit the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) from implementing new regulations on climate change adaptation. This amendment puts the nation at increased risk of food disruptions, forest fires and huge economic losses. Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.), who introduced the amendment, bizarrely claimed USDA’s climate adaptation policy was somehow a “backdoor door attempt to put a cap-and-trade program in place in the Department of Agriculture.” Far from it. The commonsense USDA policy says only that agencies should plan for that future in a way that will prevent food disruptions, massive forest fires and economic hardships. It reads, “Through adaptation planning, USDA will develop, prioritize, implement and evaluate actions to minimize climate risks and exploit new opportunities that climate change will bring.” The nation is still immersed in intense weather and climate-related disasters – from the Mississippi flood, to the Texas drought, to the Arizona fire. Some of these extreme events are happening in the same place. “I can’t get my crop out of one side of the levee because it’s too dry and I’ve lost my crop on the other side of the levee because it’s floating away,” said George Lacour, 48, of Morganza, Louisiana. The state is bearing the brunt of much of the Mississippi flood as well as a state-wide severe drought. Looking at the past record would not have prepared anyone for the devastating weather events this year – and the future is going to be different yet. Don’t we want our government to be planning for those changes? The conditions we are seeing this year are breaking records. According to Texan Matt Farmer, “It’s as dry as I’ve ever seen it in my lifetime. I don’t remember a drought this widespread. I’ve got a lot of country that’s blowing, but I can’t do a thing about it.” This year’s events are also consistent with the conditions researchers project are coming with climate change. Looking at the past record would not have prepared anyone for the devastating weather events this year – and the future is going to be different yet. Don’t we want our government to be planning for those changes? Flooded farmland, courtesy USDA Jamie Rappaport Clark, executive vice president for Defenders of Wildlife, said, “America’s farms, forests and ranchlands not only feed our country, but also help support abundant and diverse wildlife populations. Our food security, property and wildlife heritage are all at risk from increased frequency and severity of heat waves, droughts, floods, fires and pests. “Rep. Scalise and the 237 other members of the House are inhibiting the USDA’s ability to help farmers and forest owners and managers prepare for a future that includes more of the extreme weather events we have just experienced this spring. The future is not going to be the same as the past. This commonsense USDA policy says let’s plan for that future in a way that will prevent food disruptions, massive forest fires and economic hardships.” The Senate should do right by the country’s farmers, forests and the people and wildlife that rely on them, and reject this amendment. Learn more: Read about Congress’ June 3 vote to put the lives, livelihoods, property and security of Americans at increased risk. Learn more about the importance of a broad, comprehensive strategy to preparing for the impacts of climate change. 4 Responses to “BREAKING: Congress Votes Against Protecting Farms, Forests” Heidi Bresilge June 16th, 2011 Yet another example of how they fail our environment! What exactly don’t they get?!?!?! It’s awful! Reply Paul July 22nd, 2013 Corporate profits, especially in the carbon energy and transportation sectors, potentially have their profit maximization at risk if the public is aware of and takes into consideration CO2 induced climate change in public policy. That is why certain legislators are so vehemently authoritarian in adamantly denying climate change. They do this at the behest of their masters and feeders among the lobbyists for the corporations that gain from being held harmless for the externalities their products produce. Alexander June 17th, 2011 I feel personally that there is a fundamental flaw in the ideologies of these policy makers with regards to total denial of the simple fact that the demand for resources has exceeded supply long ago. Unfortunately they have been blinded to reality by greed. On a pleasant note though I have seen much progress from other nations regarding proactive green conversions, and legislative changes. There are more of us waking up every day, and truthfully the planet has reached its tipping point. Its “critical mass”. Then green conversion can be implemented rapidly and decisively when the choice is finally made; and truthfully the Global Economic profits created by these transitions are infinite.Industry,cutting edge technology, strict new ethical environmental policy on a Global scale, and a willingness from all nations to co-operate with each other for the betterment of mankind, will pay for itself in less than a year. You have my word. So let us all do our part by thinking globally, and acting locally. Reply Post Your Comment Click here to cancel reply. Name (required) Mail (required) (will not be published) You May also be interested in Westerners want to save the sage-grouse (and so do I) A majority of voters in western states want to see sage-grouse, the Sagebrush Sea and all its inhabitants protected. Defenders Celebrates Successful Listing of Sharks, Rays and Sawfish! Recently 21 imperiled species of sharks and rays gained international protection when they were added to the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS). Refuges need relief Congress and the president must do a better job in providing for America’s National Wildlife Refuge System.