29 May 2012 Spill Baby Spill Posted by: John Motsinger | 2 comments | Share: It’s been more than two years since the BP oil spill that spewed 200 million gallons of crude into the Gulf of Mexico, but not all the damage has yet been done. According to the latest AP report, the lingering effects are still taking a toll on fishermen in the Gulf, who are seeing much smaller catches in some areas. In the Barataria estuary, for example, the shrimp haul for last fall was down nearly 40 percent while the crab harvest was down nearly 30 percent. High seafood prices have helped compensate for the shortfall to some extent, and some are blaming high water in the Mississippi River and drought in Texas in addition to residual oil. But it’s clear that we haven’t seen the last of the devastation from the spill. It’s vital that we keep the BP disaster in mind, especially now that the Obama administration has agreed to let Shell drill in the Arctic this summer. Polar bears, whales and countless other species could be at serious risk from yet another oil spill that could be even more deadly than the BP spill in the Gulf. See how Defenders is working to protect wildlife and natural habitats from the dangers of offshore drilling. Help support our work to protect sea turtles and other wildlife. Text GULF to 90999 to make a $10 donation. (Message and Data Rates may apply. Mgive.com/t) 2 Responses to “Spill Baby Spill” Paul Burke - Author, Journey Home May 30th, 2012 Its called a gusher and it in no way resembles a spill – change your language – never ever refer to a gusher as a “spill” – oh oopps just a teaspoon – gushed, oozed, fissure, flow, puncture, blowout, rupture, burst, spout, break, erupt, spew, gush, vomit, overflow, run over, disgorge, flood, pour, surge, are just some of the words that tell the true tale - Millie Sheen November 18th, 2012 Why would you put such beautiful animals in harms way? With this oil spill already killing or seriously injuring many coastal birds and sea creatures. Why would you want to have the possibility of re-creating it but in a different place? And it’s just for money isn’t it? Post Your Comment Click here to cancel reply. Name (required) Mail (required) (will not be published) You May also be interested in Wolf Weekly Wrap-Up Helicopter gunning kills 23 wolves in Idaho; Urge Secretary Jewell to abandon gray wolf delisting proposal — Call your representative by March 14; Washington wildlife agency urged to end support for abolishing federal wolf protections; The latest on Governor Otter’s wolf control board. Two Too Many Development Projects in the Ivanpah Valley While these projects most definitely directly impact a species that has been identified as threatened and is dependent on the habitat where they would be built, Silver State South and Stateline’s approval is most troubling for a bigger reason. You see, this isn’t just an issue for the Ivanpah Valley. Developers and agencies need to be conscious of how and where they plan energy projects all across the country. They need to look at renewable energy planning with a landscape-wide lens, understanding that building in the right places and making an effort to minimize environmental impacts from the start are essential. California’s Rim Fire: Opportunities Rise from the Ashes After California’s devastating Rim Fire, will officials take the opportunity to give nature a chance to fully recover?