12 July 2012 House Committee Endorses Plow and Plunder Farm Bill Posted by: John Motsinger | 3 comments | Share: Massive funding cuts, sweeping policy changes endanger wildlife nationwide Vegetative buffers like these are crucial for giving animals a place to rest and take cover across America’s vast farm landscapes. The U.S. House of Representatives Agriculture Committee approved a version of the 2012 Farm Bill late last night that includes $6 billion in funding cuts and damaging policy changes to key wildlife conservation programs on America’s working landscapes. The 2012 Farm Bill eliminates direct payments to farmers, which also eliminates the long-standing provisions known as “conservation compliance” that require farmers receiving subsidies to take modest measures to protect soil, water quality, wetlands and grasslands. Proposed legislation would replace direct payments with expanded crop insurance without any compliance requirements to protect native plants and animals that rely on farm land for their survival. Thus, farmers would receive additional subsidies for plowing under critical buffers such as wetlands, river banks and sensitive riparian areas that provide refuge for native wildlife and prevent pollutants from entering our waterways. Salmon are just one species that’s severely affected by pesticide poisoning. Two specific changes to pesticide regulations within the Farm Bill would make it much easier to seriously harm or kill wildlife as well. One provision (Section 10016) would allow weaker, existing pesticide regulations under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act to trump Endangered Species Act protections, overriding the recommendations of the federal government’s own scientific experts. Another provision (Section 10017) would waive the Clean Water Act, allowing pesticides to be dumped directly into our waterways and wreaking havoc on aquatic life up and down the food chain. Several more changes to forest policy (Sections 8301 – 8304) would shamelessly exploit the danger of wildfires and harmful pests as an excuse to allow extensive logging in designated “critical areas” that could cover more than 15% of our national forests with almost no environmental review or public involvement. Here’s what Defenders’ President Jamie Rappaport Clark had to say about the bill: “Each year we lose more than a million acres of vital wildlife habitat to cropland. Now, in addition to slashing funding for wildlife conservation, Congress is asking the American taxpayer to subsidize even more habitat destruction with no strings attached. Expanding crops into environmentally sensitive lands does almost nothing for our food system but has disastrous consequences for our nation’s wildlife and water quality. We also shouldn’t be poisoning our waterways for the benefit of pesticide manufacturers and Big Ag, or giving the logging industry unfettered access to our national forests. “There are ways to ensure we have sustainable agriculture and forestry without sacrificing our most cherished natural assets, but this is definitely not it.” Read our full press release here. 3 Responses to “House Committee Endorses Plow and Plunder Farm Bill” Barbara Leonard July 12th, 2012 Well our politicians are at it again…..give tax breaks to the wealthy but we can’t afford to protect our land & environment. Barbara Leonard July 12th, 2012 I’m already protesting the welfare cattle ranchers by not buying beef any more. Now, seems we all haveto start growing our own gardens to protest Big Ag. Voters are getting TIRED of both groups. They may have the money, but there are more of us than I think they want to fight. Without us, they can’t make a living….that works for me. Jonathan July 17th, 2012 People need to get the word out so that the people who drafted this bill can be voted out of office. First the politicians got rid of the financial regulations, and today’s economic troubles are the result. Now they’re trying to get rid of all environmental protections, and the consequences will be much worse than anything we’ve seen. Post Your Comment Click here to cancel reply. Name (required) Mail (required) (will not be published) You May also be interested in Wolf Weekly Wrap-Up Helicopter gunning kills 23 wolves in Idaho; Urge Secretary Jewell to abandon gray wolf delisting proposal — Call your representative by March 14; Washington wildlife agency urged to end support for abolishing federal wolf protections; The latest on Governor Otter’s wolf control board. Two Too Many Development Projects in the Ivanpah Valley While these projects most definitely directly impact a species that has been identified as threatened and is dependent on the habitat where they would be built, Silver State South and Stateline’s approval is most troubling for a bigger reason. You see, this isn’t just an issue for the Ivanpah Valley. Developers and agencies need to be conscious of how and where they plan energy projects all across the country. They need to look at renewable energy planning with a landscape-wide lens, understanding that building in the right places and making an effort to minimize environmental impacts from the start are essential. California’s Rim Fire: Opportunities Rise from the Ashes After California’s devastating Rim Fire, will officials take the opportunity to give nature a chance to fully recover?