21 September 2012 Wolf Weekly Wrap-up Posted by: John Motsinger | 6 comments | Share: WaPo’s omissions – A feature story in the Washington Post on Monday took a broad look at the status of wolves nationwide, but it missed a few key points. First, there’s no mention anywhere of the fact that wolves in Montana and Idaho were delisted last year by Congressional fiat. This was the first time in the history of the Endangered Species Act that protections have been stripped by politicians rather than scientists, setting a dangerous precedent for dealing with other controversial species in the future. Second, the article glosses over how wolves are being treated very differently than other wildlife. No other species, especially one that was recently protected under the ESA, is managed at such low population levels. We rarely hear any complaints about the thousands of bears and mountain lions in the Northern Rockies, but for some reason there is almost no tolerance for even a few hundred wolves. Why single out this species for persecution? States ought to be managing for healthy wolf populations, just like they manage for all other native species. Wolves are important predators that help maintain balanced ecosystems. They can’t perform this essential function though if their numbers are kept at a biological minimum on the landscape. Dogs in wolf country – Wolves are rarely ever a threat to humans, unless they’ve become habituated through regular feeding. But a story this week from the Spokesman-Review reminds us that in wolf country we need to watch out for our pets as well. Jim Groth was out in northeastern Washington doing mushroom surveys for the Forest Service when his dog got into a rare scuffle with a wolf. Groth was able to rescue his dog and eventually scare two wolves away, but the encounter left a lasting impression on him. Though very few of us will ever encounter a wolf in the wild, here are a few helpful hints, just in case. If you’re headed out into wolf country, keep your dog on a leash. Wolves see dogs as strange rival wolves and may try to attack if given the opportunity. If a wolf gets too close for comfort, do your best to act tough and scare them away by making loud noises or throwing rocks in their direction. Consider carrying bear spray (most places with wolves also have bears, and spray will work just fine on wolves too). But also remember that not a single person has been killed or even injured in Northern Rockies since wolves were reintroduced more than 15 years ago. So keep your pets close and you should be fine. Ultimately, it’s up to all of us to make sure that wolves keep a healthy fear of humans, which prevents conflict and keeps wolves alive over the long run. Mange kills wolves in Yellowstone– For years, Defenders has been saying that maintaining just a few hundred wolves in the Northern Rockies isn’t good enough. Here’s a good reason why. A report from Live Science says that mange is becoming a bigger problem in Yellowstone National Park and is at least part of the reason why the wolf population has dropped significantly in recent years. A robust wolf population spread over a large landscape can sustain disease epidemics without a problem. But disease spreads quickly and can have disastrous consequences when a species is confined to smaller areas. The goal should be to sustain a sufficiently large and well-distributed population across the Northern Rockies rather than concentrating populations in select areas of each state where they are more vulnerable to disease. Suzanne tells all – Our top wolf expert Suzanne Stone isn’t one to pull punches, and in a recent interview on the Green Global Travel blog, she gave straightforward answers to some tough questions. Why do people demonize wolves? Why are wolves important? How can we resolve the ongoing conflicts between people and wildlife? Read the blog to find out. “If you look into the eyes of a wild wolf, there is something there more powerful than many humans can accept.” – Suzanne Stone 6 Responses to “Wolf Weekly Wrap-up” Bret @ Green Global Travel September 21st, 2012 Thanks for sharing Green Global Travel’s interview with Suzanne! It’s always mystified me why humans treat wolves so differently than, say, lions, tigers or bears (oh my!). So it was great to get inside perspective from an expert working on the front lines to protect this amazing species. You can count on GGT’s support for all your future conservation efforts! Reply bailey September 24th, 2012 i love this website.i am doing a report on gray wolves so this is the pefect place to find infermation! Reply Mary VanAssche September 26th, 2012 What is going on in the State of Washington in killing off wolf packs? Isn’t anyone helping to save them? What a tragedy! I wrote to the govenor, expecting the usual canned response that Fish & Wildlife know what they are doing. Please tell me that someone is working on their behalf to halt this aerial gunning down of wolves. Reply Steve C September 28th, 2012 I am a supporter of Defenders. I am dissapointed that they havent taken quicker action in filing suit to stop the Open Season On Wolves in Wyoming due to start Sunday Sept 30. They say they are going to, but have to wait 60 days. Once the slaughter starts though it will be hard to stop. I think Defenders needs to do something before Sunday. Get an injunction or something. These things are easier to stop before they get started. Come up with something guys. Reply John Motsinger September 28th, 2012 We filed suit within hours of when we were legally allowed to, but unfortunately from that point, the 60 day waiting period is a legal requirement — we can’t take action before then, which is very frustrating for us, too. But we have also been working to prevent and respond to the situation. When we first found out about the delisting, we reached out to officials in the administration to talk about how it could affect wolf populations in Wyoming and across the region. We gathered more than 82,000 signatures to send to President Obama to stop the delisting, and even now have more than 43,000 (and counting) asking Wyoming Governor Mead to reconsider (which you can also sign here: http://dfnd.us/Oq4gGz ) . We also have biologists and field staff on the ground getting a sense for how many wolves outside Yellowstone will be affected by this management plan. What it comes down to now is fighting this decision in the courtroom as soon as the waiting period is over, and the work we’re doing on the ground across the Rockies teaching people how to coexist peacefully with wolves so that irresponsible, overly aggressive management plans like Wyoming’s are not created in the first place. Steve C September 29th, 2012 I understand you are trying to follow the 60 day waiting period, but there must be a way to get an injunction to stop this until the other suit can be heard. Once the cat is out of the bag it is very hard to put back in. Injunctions are a manuever used often to go outside the normal filings and stop something until the main suit can be heard. Tommorrow it may be too late. Ken Salazar has been a huge dissapointment on this issue. He and Governor Mead sat down almost 6 months ago here in Cheyenne and hashed out a deal to slaughter Wyomings wolves. Shame on them for not knowing the science or consequences of their deal. Post Your Comment Click here to cancel reply. Name (required) Mail (required) (will not be published) You May also be interested in Helping a Halloween Icon Protecting the bat population is good for people, agriculture, and our environment. Remember the Owens Valley Photographer and writer Krista Schyler shares the first part of her California Desert Tour series, featuring the beautiful Owens Valley. Home On The Range Our lead field manager Fernando Najera describes a day in the life of the Wood River Wolf Project, the nation’s most successful wolf and sheep coexistence project.