16 July 2013 Lights out for Calico Solar Posted by: Courtney Sexton | 5 comments | Share: Courtney Sexton, Communications Associate Defenders’ dedication to renewable energy sourcing that is “smart from the start” paid off when Calico Solar, LLC pulled the plug on a massive solar energy project that would have wrought havoc on thousands of acres public land that harbor numerous sensitive species of animals and plants and link the western and eastern regions of the vast Mojave Desert, habitat critical to the desert tortoise. The fragile habitat of the Mojave Desert California’s requirement that utilities obtain at least 33% of their supply from renewable resources by 2020, coupled with a federal push for renewable energy development on public lands, has turned the state into a literal hotbed for renewable projects (and it is likely to become an even bigger one with the launch of President Obama’s Climate Action Plan). While this, generally speaking, is a good thing – good for the environment, good for jobs, good for our country’s need to pare back on greenhouse gas emissions – renewable energy development is nonetheless a field that must be carefully navigated, especially in places like California’s Mojave Desert, which supports diverse communities of plants and animals, many of which are at-risk from long-term human activities in the region. In 2007, Stirling Energy Systems Solar One, LLC (SES Solar Three LLC and SES Solar Six LLC) submitted applications to the California Energy Commission (CEC) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for the construction and operation of a solar energy project that would include about 30,000 25-kilowatt solar dishes, and cover a 8,230 acre site in San Bernardino County. In 2010, the companies merged, becoming a subsidiary of Tessera Solar, and the venture we know as the Calico Solar Project was approved for licensing certification by the CEC, and by the BLM for construction and operation of the project through a right-of-way grant. The project raised a red flag with Defenders’ staff in California from the onset, as it was clear that Calico would cause significant adverse impacts to several at-risk species and their habitats, including the threatened desert tortoise, white-margined beardtongue, Mojave fringe-toed lizard, burrowing owl, golden eagle and others. For nearly two years Defenders followed developments with increasing concern regarding the siting of the project. Comments from Defenders and several other conservation groups warned of the impacts the project would have, faulted the BLM for analyzing only the proposed site in their EIS and offered a recommendation to both the BLM and CEC to relocate the project to an environmentally acceptable site. The Calico project was sited on prime Desert tortoise habitat. Initially, our efforts seemed made to no avail – Calico was approved. The CEC did analyze a private land alternative, but chose to approve the proposed project, nonetheless. The BLM also included an additional surprise in their final Environmental Impact Statement: a tortoise translocation plan that would likely result in the deaths of many of these animals (both those being moved and those already occurring in the relocation habitat), and inflict undue stress on two adjacent federal Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, public land areas designated for special conservation. Because the concerns voiced by the environmental community were not considered, Defenders (along with the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, Center for Biological Diversity and The Wilderness Society) moved forward with strong opposition to Calico by submitting a formal protest to the BLM director on grounds that the project violated various laws, regulations and policies that are meant to protect sensitive species and their habitats on public lands. Though the BLM and CEC recognized that impacts would be significant, even a formal protest wasn’t enough to stop the continued planning of the project. As a result, Defenders, the NRDC and the Sierra Club took legal action and filed suit against the BLM and the CEC in federal court. With continued pressure from conservationists mounting, Calico hit several other roadblocks that stalled the project, including a challenge from the Burlington-Northern Railroad Company regarding safety issues and the cancellation of a power purchase agreement with Southern California Edison. It slowly became clear to developers that this project was destined to fail after all. Clearly, Calico was NOT going to produce the kind of renewable energy we need, that is, the kind that doesn’t come at the expense of wildlife and the environment. The BLM acted hastily in approving this subpar project and disregarded the conservation values of the public lands that would be lost. Though the company cited “changed market conditions” as their reason for abandoning the Calico project, the truth of the matter speaks for itself—poorly sited projects are risky not only for the environment, but for the developers as well. Like the wildlife, developers benefit most when projects are planned smart from the start. In a June 20 letter to the California Energy Commission, Calico formally nixed the project by surrendering its building and operating license. The sun has officially gone down on Calico, and with our continued efforts, it is instead rising in the realm of responsible renewable energy. 5 Responses to “Lights out for Calico Solar” Curt Leake August 11th, 2013 Please DOW go after the wind farms of California and apply the same standards to those horrible eyesores and bird killing, oil dripping, loud machines all over the Mojave hills. The wind-farms are too poorly designed and need to be removed as well. Reply Casey August 12th, 2013 I’m glad you were able to help prevent this. Having lived in the area the Mojave Desert and it’s creatures hold a special place in my heart. However, I hope that you are also helping to explore responsible renewable energy. We can’t forget that we NEED to come up with other ways for energy. Our current use of fossil fuels is wreaking havoc our environment at astronomical rates. We need to find an alternative. I agree it should not be at the expense of wildlife, but we have to keep pushing until we find workable solutions with minimal environment impact. Blocking this alone is not enough of a victory. Blocking this and coming up with a better solution would be. Reply sebastian August 12th, 2013 Now is time to help them find a new place for this project. This is half victory. This company wants create clean energy and it is our responsible to work with them. Reply Heather August 14th, 2013 The Mojave Desert is a mass of solar panels and wind turbines – it’s overkill! I’m all for alternative energy, but what’s been happening in just the last few years is ridiculous. I’m glad that the Calico Solar Project was stopped, but I can’t help but wonder what they’re going to try next. We can only breathe a sigh of relief – for now. The biggest challenge we face is convincing the general public and politicians that our land and wildlife should not be sacrificed in the name of “energy.” If we can make a cell phone that holds millions of bytes of information, takes pictures and acts as a computer, why can’t they make a solar panel the size of a cell phone and apply bladeless technology to the turbines? Reply Karen Uyeno August 24th, 2013 I think it’s a shame they didn’t relocate the desert tortoise and go ahead with the Calico Solar Project. There’s always some animal that will have a conflict with solar and wind energy. I think sometimes we have to compromise. Reply Post Your Comment Click here to cancel reply. Name (required) Mail (required) (will not be published) You May also be interested in Westerners want to save the sage-grouse (and so do I) A majority of voters in western states want to see sage-grouse, the Sagebrush Sea and all its inhabitants protected. Defenders Celebrates Successful Listing of Sharks, Rays and Sawfish! Recently 21 imperiled species of sharks and rays gained international protection when they were added to the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS). Refuges need relief Congress and the president must do a better job in providing for America’s National Wildlife Refuge System.