19 August 2013 The Truth about the Texas Lizard “Conservation” Plan Posted by: Ya-Wei Li | 19 comments | Share: Ya-Wei Li, Policy Advisor, Endangered Species Conservation Crane County, Texas is a land peppered with oil and gas wells, connected by arteries of pipelines and dirt roads. It’s one of the top counties for oil and gas production in Texas. It’s also where the dunes sagebrush lizard is trying to persist amidst all the mayhem. Last June, the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service decided that it no longer needed to list the lizard under the Endangered Species Act, partly because it had signed a conservation plan (called the Texas Habitat Conservation Plan) for the lizard with the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts. Earlier this year, we explained why the plan can’t protect the lizard. For one reason, it doesn’t describe how landowners will protect the species from oil and gas development, off-road vehicle use and other activities that can squish lizards. Without this information, the Service has absolutely no idea whether the plan will live up to its promises. The Comptroller certainly believes it will. Ever since it signed the plan in April 2012, it’s been reporting every month to the Service that not a single acre of enrolled habitat has been disturbed. That’s right, nothing across over 138,640 acres in some of the most productive oil and gas counties in Texas. Sound too good to be true? We thought so too, so we launched our own investigation. My colleague, Andy Shepard, and I compared aerial images taken immediately after an area was enrolled in the Texas plan, with images taken four and then thirteen months later. What we discovered were multiple instances of habitat destruction that the Comptroller was required to report to the Service, but never did. We’re talking about new oil drilling pads, dirt roads and land clearings. You can see all the before and after images in our newly-released report and supplemental presentation, which show the images in higher quality. As an example, the images below show three oil well pads, each about 400 feet wide, created after the plan went into effect. ©Defenders of Wildlife ©Defenders of Wildlife A website that collects Texas oil and gas permitting information (www.texas-drilling.com/crane-county) places a red dot on all the areas in Crane County with recently issued oil and gas drilling permits. As expected, a dot appears over each of these well pads. Only a few hundred feet away, we found more new oil pads and roads that apparently don’t exist – at least, according to the Comptroller they don’t. The story gets even better. You might be wondering how the Comptroller keeps track of which areas are destroyed by oil and gas development. A non-profit organization called the Texas Habitat Conservation Foundation was created to collect and report this information to the Comptroller, and to administer other crucial parts of the Texas Plan. As it turns out, however, this so-called “conservation” foundation is directed solely by lobbyists for the Texas Oil and Gas Association. Legally, every time oil and gas developers disturb lizard habitat, they are required to pay a fee under the Texas plan to offset the impacts of their development activity. If no disturbance is reported, then there are no fees to pay. It’s hard not to suspect a conflict of interest here. Dune sagebrush lizard (©Mark L. Watson) Monetary suspicions aside, without knowing how much habitat is destroyed, the Service can’t effectively ensure that the lizard is protected. Under the Texas plan, habitat destruction is capped at one percent of the total habitat for the species within the first three years. If this limit is exceeded, the Service will likely have to reconsider listing the lizard. But without a system to verify the Comptroller’s claims about habitat disturbance, the Service might not know if and when this one percent limit is exceeded. We hope our investigation sends a signal far and wide that conservation plans like this one where the Service is completely in the dark about plan compliance simply don’t work. At the most basic level, a plan shouldn’t leave the public or the Service in the dark about how it will protect a species – especially if the plan is used as an excuse to avoid listing an imperiled species. And if a plan relies on self-reporting, it shouldn’t be performed solely by lobbyists for the industry that poses the greatest threat to the species. Fortunately, tools like GIS mapping allow us to shed light on some of the darkest corners of how states try to avoid listing an endangered species. 19 Responses to “The Truth about the Texas Lizard “Conservation” Plan” Sophia Moore. August 19th, 2013 Unfreakinbelievable. How is it possible they can keep getting away with this destruction. Thanks for the post Ya-Wei Li. Elizabeth O'Connor September 15th, 2013 The Dune Sagebrush Lizard needs protection against the ones sworn to protect them – the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts and the bogus lobbyist organization, The Texas Habitat Conservation Plan. They must be protected once again by the Endangered Species Act. These big money chasing giants in the oil and gas industry can not be allowed to ignore even the smallest among us! Elizabeth O’Connor Maggie Frazier September 15th, 2013 As with all of the oil & gas industries “self monitoring” doesn’t seem to work, now does it? Why are these corporations not held to the same regulations any other company is? There sure does need to be some changes made – especially with the lobbyists access to our politicians! Art deVitalis September 15th, 2013 This Texas lizard deal is really simple. The Bubbas that run this state are not concerned in the least in with wild critters unless they can hunt them with their helicopter gunships. And besides this is God’s Country. The third reason is to quote our two honorable US Senators: this isn’t the “best science” or “sound science”. Charles September 15th, 2013 most states still refuse to pay for damages from Katrina or the oil spill Yenisel Montane September 15th, 2013 So over lobbyists & them covering up things they should clearly be held accountable for. There should be a petition in place to gain control back from the comptroller considering they’re conflict of interest with the third party. I’d sign! Thanks for your information regarding this issue we just need to now put action behind this informatation for the sake of the sage brush lizard! Pamela Cibbarelli September 15th, 2013 What a shame! Employees at an office empowered to save a species thinks it is better to lie and cheat rather than to help. They are not to be trusted. Susan D. Martin September 15th, 2013 “How is it possible they can keep getting away with this destruction?” The answer in one word: M-O-N-E-Y… KAREN BIS September 15th, 2013 Ban the (rubbish) plan! SANDI HEBERT September 15th, 2013 THE NEED FOR GREED CONTINUES! WATCH OUT FOLKS WE’RE ON THAT LIST TOO, JUST LATER DOWN THE LINE. OUR ENVIRONMENT AND WELL BEING IS UP FOR GRABS. FORGET OUR CHILDREN ET, AND WORSHIP THE ALMIGHTY BUCK! GOD HELP US…………. Aviana13 September 15th, 2013 It’s Texas – can anyone really expect better? Edh Stanley September 15th, 2013 More of something that they grow Big in Texas; in this case, horesh*t… Greg Dolecki September 15th, 2013 If I had to give up heating oil for my home in Winter to save the lizard, would I do it? Nick Seaman September 15th, 2013 Letting entrenched oil industry representatives monitor activity is like leaving the fox in charge of the hen house. Who allows that except someone who has no intention to make good on a legal and moral obligation and indeed whose only intention is to flagrantly overturn alegal construct. Sam September 16th, 2013 I don’t quite see how a “fee’ will help stop destruction that has already taken place. The only response would be for someone (a company?) to buy the land, and leave it well alone. The way the entire planet should have been left well alone and free from ‘drilling’ of any kind… Donna Scheff September 16th, 2013 it seems the endangered species list is meaningless anymore. There situation is lied about, their habitat destroyed. The government seems intent on eliminating their endangered status to assist special interest groups John D Coffey, JD September 16th, 2013 This is another example of The Endangered Species Eradication Plan, which is pursued with vigor by developers of so-called Green energy in the Mojave. Six endangered species are under attack, including the Desert Tortoise, Fringe Toed Lizard, Kit Fox, Big Horn Sheep,Kangaroo Rat, and the Mojave Green rattlesnake. BLM and DOE just want to take care of cronys of Obama, and get rid of the “nuisance critters” as fast as possible to ramrod project approvals. We need to have a nationwide federal class action lawsuit to bring this fast-buck driven genocide to a halt. Please help Defenders of Wildlife while there is still something to save! Thanks for listening. Bob Sloan September 16th, 2013 The State of Texas will only protect wildlife they are unable to make serious money on. It is okay to come into Texas and slaughter as many animals as you can afford, but pick a snake up off the road and you are a criminal in Texas. The TP&W should be defunded and dissolved. Post Your Comment Click here to cancel reply. Name (required) Mail (required) (will not be published) You May also be interested in Senate Wakes Up to Climate Change…At Least Some of Them Tonight more than 20 senators will be taking over the Senate floor to pull an all-nighter to “wake up” Congress to climate change. Wolf Weekly Wrap-Up Helicopter gunning kills 23 wolves in Idaho; Urge Secretary Jewell to abandon gray wolf delisting proposal — Call your representative by March 14; Washington wildlife agency urged to end support for abolishing federal wolf protections; The latest on Governor Otter’s wolf control board. Two Too Many Development Projects in the Ivanpah Valley While these projects most definitely directly impact a species that has been identified as threatened and is dependent on the habitat where they would be built, Silver State South and Stateline’s approval is most troubling for a bigger reason. You see, this isn’t just an issue for the Ivanpah Valley. Developers and agencies need to be conscious of how and where they plan energy projects all across the country. They need to look at renewable energy planning with a landscape-wide lens, understanding that building in the right places and making an effort to minimize environmental impacts from the start are essential.