21 May 2014 What Happened to Stewardship in Congress? Posted by: Jamie Rappaport Clark | 5 comments | Share: Stewardship of our natural heritage has gone missing in Congress. Forty years ago, our political leaders acted as visionary statesmen when they passed a series of landmark laws to protect the treasured natural resources on which we all depend: our air, land, water and wildlife. These bold leaders approved the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act with wide bipartisan majorities, believing it was their generation’s responsibility to protect our country’s heritage for future generations. Back then, conservation was not a partisan issue, it was an American duty and responsibility. And, it was Congress’ duty to set the example as steward of those incredible resources. But today, many of our political leaders have lost sight of their stewardship responsibility to the American public. Instead of conserving and protecting America’s natural resources, many members in Congress seem primarily focused on short term economic gain, regardless of the environmental consequences. They are working hard to deliver a legislative agenda that seems to align directly with today’s powerful oil and gas, mining, development and polluting industries. Forty years ago, conservation was a cause founded on integrity and a sense of civic responsibility. Today, it is just one more issue on the chopping block, used by too many in Congress as a scapegoat to advance a shrunken, selfish vision of government, based upon a partisan deregulation agenda that, if adopted, would destroy the keystone safeguards that were put in place to protect our communities and our natural resources. Protecting endangered species like sea turtles wasn’t always a partisan issue. Despite the potentially devastating consequences, too many members of Congress continue to propose draconian cuts to programs that conserve imperiled wildlife and their habitat. While many of these bills do not make their way past the Senate, the aggressive partisan attacks on our nation’s natural resources is emblematic of the larger anti-conservation fever alive today in the House of Representatives. Last year, the House version of the Department of the Interior appropriations bill included a drastic 27 percent cut in funding for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service — our premier federal agency tasked with overseeing protections for imperiled wildlife. In addition to proposing staggering budget cuts, the House Natural Resources Committee continues to propose excessive burdens and bureaucratic hurdles on the Service, while disingenuously touting its attacks as benign “conservation reform.” This is especially true when it comes to the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Today, the ESA has a dangerous and powerful adversary: Representative Doc Hastings, who chairs the House Natural Resources Committee. In February, Chairman Hastings and his self-appointed, highly partisan “ESA Working Group” issued a report and set of sweeping anti-ESA “reforms,” outlining a strategy that would severely weaken the law’s ability to protect our most imperiled species and their habitat. In April, Hastings supported four bills drawn from his so-called reform package and rammed them through his committee. These bills do nothing to speed recovery of imperiled wildlife or advance endangered species conservation. Instead, the bills would dramatically reduce the ability of the public to hold agencies accountable for complying with the provisions of the ESA, generate more red tape, warp the scientific basis for protecting imperiled species, and create huge new bureaucratic hurdles to species recovery. In short, these bills provide a cynical pathway towards accelerated species extinctions. Click here to contact your representative and ask them to vote NO on these dangerous bills! While Democratic members of the House Natural Resource Committee proposed amendments to blunt the impact of these harmful bills, those amendments were rejected and the bills were passed along party lines. The House leadership cannot continue to conceal its attacks on imperiled wildlife. Disingenuously hiding behind the euphemism of conservation “reform,” their goal of gutting our nation’s ability to protect imperiled wildlife and our natural heritage must be stopped. We cannot let the voice of a powerful but vocal few outweigh the interests of the American public which overwhelmingly supports effective conservation. Instead of tired politicking, it would be refreshing to see conservation stewardship once again become the hallmark of our broken and dysfunctional Congress. Jamie Rappaport Clark, President & CEO of Defenders of Wildlife This post first appeared in The Huffington Post 5 Responses to “What Happened to Stewardship in Congress?” Taylor Rose Felker May 21st, 2014 The viability of our environment, atmosphere, waterways all depend on a healthy ecosystem which is completely dependent on a healthy population of all wildlife species; all are interconnected from apex predators to the smallest insect. Continuing to cruelly, thoughtlessly, and recklessly slaughter wildlife the environment depends upon and continuing to degrade the environment wildlife depends upon is a grave mistake. House leadership has a history of pushing destructive legislation in all areas…they should not be taken seriously on this issue and should not be allowed to disingenuously manipulate our government with their extremely harmful agenda to deliberately allow even more harm to our wildlife. This must be stopped. Reply Alexander Yeung May 21st, 2014 They shouldn’t be doing this or else they face a crysis for their foolish action. Reply lin May 22nd, 2014 Kudos!!!! Well researched and argued. Thank you for documenting the shift away from caretaking and taking care to a greedy and short sighted exploitation of our environment and our wildlife. Reply Ruth May 22nd, 2014 I don’t understand why they don’t care. Reply Carl June 25th, 2014 Because they work for the developers and fossil fuel companies, not for the people. I’d say at least 75% of their “Report” (that term applies very loosely here) is anecdotal evidence of cases where the ESA has negatively affected development. There is no mention of the overwhelming success that the Endangered Species Act has had in preventing further extinctions, or the thousands of high-paying jobs that have been created as a result of the Act. As the author of this well-written article states, this is an attack on the entire Endangered Species Act that is masquerading as “reform”. Reply Post Your Comment Click here to cancel reply. Name (required) Mail (required) (will not be published) You May also be interested in Wolf Weekly Wrap-Up: Happy Howl-o-ween! Could it be true? A Northern Rockies gray wolf in Arizona!!? Will BLM say “No” to Wolf Killing Contest? An Update from the Field: A Summary of this Week’s Wolf Research Panel in Seattle Helping a Halloween Icon Protecting the bat population is good for people, agriculture, and our environment. Remember the Owens Valley Photographer and writer Krista Schyler shares the first part of her California Desert Tour series, featuring the beautiful Owens Valley.