Archive | Rocky Mountains

Wolf, (c) James Brandenburg / National Geographic Stock

Wolf Weekly Wrap-up

Montana hunt ends for season – In a unanimous vote, the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission decided not to extend the 2011-2012 wolf hunt in the Bitterroot Valley. Chairman Bob Ream told the Associated Press on Wednesday: “The quota is a ceiling; it’s not a basement. If we haven’t reached the ceiling we haven’t failed. It’s been a good season and people should treat wolves like other game animals.” In comments submitted to the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission Defenders agreed that the quota should not be treated as a target. Defenders also called into question assertions that wolves were to blame for declining elk numbers in the area as research into the causes of the decline is ongoing and as yet incomplete.

Thanks to all our supporters who voiced their concerns with the proposal, urging Montana to take a more measured approach to managing wolves. Your calls and letters helped convince the Montana wildlife commission that wolf management should be based on sound science, not unsubstantiated claims about the impacts of wolves.

Now that the extension has been denied, the wolf hunting season in Montana is officially over. A total of 166 wolves were killed this season during the hunt, filling or exceeding quotas in four hunting zones and coming close in several others. This summer, wildlife officials will revisit the overall quota of 220 wolves and consider modifying hunting restrictions for the next hunting season.

Wyoming wolf bill passes Senate committee – Wyoming’s revised wolf management plan, which would allow wolves to be shot on sight across a majority of the state, sailed through the state Senate wildlife committee with unanimous approval on Thursday (see full story in Casper Tribune). That shouldn’t be surprising, especially after Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead made the plan a focal point of his State of the State address on Tuesday. Mead told state legislators to approve the plan before concerned citizens have a chance to challenge it in the courts (see full story in Jackson Hole News & Guide). The controversial wolf plan has gained national attention as it would allow wolves to be killed along the John D Rockefeller Parkway that connects Yellowstone National Park and Grand Teton National Park. Listen to the story on NPR’s All Things Considered:

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Idaho’s latest, craziest wolf kill bill – A bill circulating in the Idaho state legislature would take unchecked wolf-killing to all-new heights. A provision introduced by state Sen. Jeff Siddoway would allow ranchers to kill wolves using motorized vehicles, night vision scopes, electronic calls, traps with live bait, and ultra-light aircraft like powered parachutes.

The state has already foregone hunting quotas across most of the state and authorized the use of aerial gunning to kill up to 75 wolves in the Lolo zone of Clearwater National Forest. Now, state Sen. Jeff Siddoway wants to give ranchers carte blanche to kill wolves by practically any means. When will Idaho’s elected officials stand up and say enough is enough?

The bill comes before the state Senate Environment and Resources Committee on Monday afternoon. Please help us speak out in opposition to this awful legislation.

Read more in The Republic or click here to see the text of the proposed bill.

 

 

Bookmark and Share

Posted in Audio, Features, In the News, Rocky Mountains, Species at Risk, Wolves0 Comments

Wolf, (c) Michael S. Quinton / National Geographic Stock

Wolf Weekly Wrap-up

Watch out for Wyoming wolf bill – Wolf management will be on the top of the agenda for Wyoming legislators who convene for a short 20-day budget session next week (See Sublette Examiner for full story). Although the federal government has already issued its proposed delisting rule for wolves in Wyoming, the state legislature must first adopt a new wolf management plan. The draft legislation tracks with the provisions outlined in an agreement between Wyoming Gov. Matt Mead and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar in the summer. If adopted, that plan would allow wolves to be shot on sight across a majority of the state, including in our national forests. Another controversial provision would create a “flex zone” where wolves are hunted as trophy game for part of the year but treated as unwanted predators the rest of the year. Defenders and our conservation allies have been pushing the state to adopt year-round trophy game status across the entire, but time is running out. Unless the proposed management plan gets tied up in the legislature (which is still a possibility), we could see wolves once again lose their federal protection in Wyoming by the end of the spring.  The last time this happened, all known wolves in the predator zone were killed.

The alpha male of the Imnaha pack.

A tale of two wolvesIt was the best of times. It was the worst of times… For OR-7, his greatest challenge is finding a mate during the February breeding season. For his brother OR-9, the journey is over.

OR-7, the now-legendary lone wolf that has made his way from northeast Oregon into California, has spent more than a month exploring new territory on his own without incident. OR-9, a 2 1/2-year-old male wolf also from Oregon’s Imnaha pack, was shot illegally last month by a hunter in Idaho. Idaho Fish & Game has let the hunter off with a warning, blaming the incident on reportedly bad information from a wolf tag vendor and showing their willingness to turn a blind eye on wolf poaching. Read more in the Wallowa County Chieftain.

The divergent stories of these two wolves put contrasting approaches to wolf management in stark relief. With the arrival of its first wolf, California Department of Fish and Game has been taking a measured and thoughtful approach. They’ve already held several meetings with key stakeholders and published valuable information dispelling common myths about wolves. In Idaho, however, where wolves have now been delisted, wolf-killing has reached an all-time high. To date, 285 wolves have been killed by hunters and trappers in Idaho and an untold number have been killed by poachers. Still more wolves have been removed by state and federal wildlife managers in response to livestock depredations. Idaho Fish and Game is also still planning to take it a step further by killing up to 75 wolves by aerial gunning in the Lolo zone of Clearwater National Forest in an effort to boost elk numbers for hunters.

These aggressive actions suggest Idaho is on a crusade to reduce wolf numbers rather than managing the species responsibly.  It is validating our deepest concerns about the inadequacy of the federal wolf delisting plan which allows the states to radically reduce wolf numbers to unsustainable levels.

Bookmark and Share

Posted in Features, In the News, Rocky Mountains, Species at Risk, Wolves6 Comments

Two More Tributes for Dave Gaillard

In Memory of David Gaillard.

As we carry on the work of our colleague Dave Gaillard, lost in an avalanche on New Year’s Eve, we want to share two last noteworthy tributes because of what they can teach us and because, well, he deserves them.

The first, a resolution of the Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Commission, highlights the value of the kind and respectful way Dave conducted his life and work. We are not always in full agreement with the Commission, but their appreciation of Dave and his approach to conservation reaffirms that we share a commitment to wildlife and can be more effective when we respect one another. Thank you, Commissioners!

MONTANA FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS COMMISSION RESOLUTION

David Gaillard, a resident of Bozeman, Montana in body, but a member, both in spirit and presence, of wild places in Montana and a true human friend of all wild things with whom he shared his outdoor home, lost his life tragically in the prime of his years on December 31, 2012.

Whereas: David Gaillard was endowed with special qualities of personal character and natural leadership that caused his fellow Montanans to seek him out as a leader of their choice for their conservation advocacy and was a long-standing member of the conservation community with a kind and generous heart.

Whereas: David Gaillard appeared in front of Montana’s Fish, Wildlife, and Parks Commission on several occasion in support of wolverines, fishers, kit fox, and wolves. David Gaillard was always polite, informative, and considerate even when the Commission did not support his position. This approach to public discourse and public participation was a tribute to his character and set the standard for wildlife advocates in the public arena.

Whereas: David Gaillard was a family man with a loving daughter and wife who live on in his absence. David’s work on behalf of wildlife in Montana will benefit not only the wildlife owned by the people of Montana but will insure that Montana’s wild places continue to be wild for many generations to follow.

Whereas: David Gaillard cared deeply about the public good, effective in his debate, informed in his advocacy, committed in his service, thoughtful in his approach, tolerant in his message, and responsible to the future.

Whereas: One of David Gaillard’s highest priorities was to get people in the conservation community and the other stakeholders in wildlife management issues to work closely, effectively and in a collegial manner.

Whereas: Advocates for wildlife conservation often look deep into their past to find inspiration in the life works of great citizens of high office many generations gone; we the living generation of Montana
wildlife conservationists, hunters and anglers need look no further into our past than the life and works of David Gaillard to find our personal inspiration to a calling greater than ourselves – to preserve a clean and healthy environment for this and future generations.

———

Therefore, that his memory should serve the future, be it resolved by acclamation of the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission acting in regular session on January 19, 2012 in Helena Montana that the life and service of David Gaillard to the people of Montana and to the preservation and enhancement of the fish and wildlife resources of this state be formally honored and preserved in the public record.

THE FISH, WILDLIFE & PARKS COMMISSION

Bob Ream, Chairman Dan Vermillion, Vice-Chairman

Shane Colton, Commissioner A. T. Stafne, Commissioner

Ron Moody, Commissioner

Nai'a LeDain of Bozeman, Montana

The second, from an impressive young lady inspired by a wolverine educational event Dave hosted, refreshes us with a reminder of the positive results and broad reach our work can have. Thanks Nai’a!

Monforton School FundraiserAs an enthusiastic supporter of Defenders of Wildlife, it was with sadness that I began 2012 learning of the news of my friend David Gaillard’s death in Cooke City. My name is Nai’a Le Dain and I am in 6th grade at Monforton School in Four Corners, Montana, which is just to the west of Bozeman. After doing my annual Solstice adoption of an endangered species with my mom (this time a mom and baby polar bear), I decided to do a fundraiser at my school to further bring the issues facing endangered species to my schoolmates (click here to see the flyer I made).

We successfully completed a fundraiser in honor of David Gaillard and for Defenders of Wildlife last week. Our school and friends brought over $300 to David’s memorial fund, with awesome experiences throughout the process of making the people at Monforton aware of all the endangered species. David Gaillard was also my art teacher Ms. Filloux’s ex-husband and they have an 11-year-old daughter. His death was very hard for many that had been touched by who he was and his amazing passion for his work. He helped me, personally get more information about one of my favorite topics, endangered wildlife – initially starting with our amazing local super creature, the wolverine.

The experiences I had were both good and bad. When speaking with one of the Kindergarten classes, for instance they were not really paying attention until I said we would get stuffed animals. They ended up being one of the classes that raised the most money. The hardest part of doing this fundraiser was not having David Gaillard to help me get more information. The fundraiser would have happened in half the time it took for me to organize this if David had been there to help me.

I loved the support everyone gave to me. One of the second grade teachers, Mrs. Henderson, was so supportive and kind. She really made me feel good. Ms. Filloux has been so strong and everyone is very proud of her for staying strong through this very hard time. And Lacy Gray at our local Defenders office organized getting Monforton endangered “wildcat” (our mascot) plushies and adoption certificates which will now live in our school trophy case.

So thank you to everyone who donated money and thank you to everyone who helped. If you have read this I hope you are encouraged to do something for endangered wildlife. Let’s just say, you can do anything as small as just going and enjoying nature to making a fundraiser.

We learned a lot from Dave while he was with us, and we continue to learn from him through those he touched.

Bookmark and Share

Posted in Features, Heroes, Rocky Mountains, Species at Risk, Wildlife, Wolverines0 Comments

Wolf, (c) John Eastcott and Yva Momatiuk / National Geographic Stock

Wolf Weekly Wrap-up

Wolves, like this on in the Cascade Mountains, are receiving the ire of the Yakima County Farm Bureau even though only one livestock loss has been attributed to wolves in Washington in more than five years.

Tempers flare in Pacific Northwest – Though there are fewer than 30 wolves in Washington, and the state’s wolf management plan has only recently been approved, wolf opponents are already pushing for more aggressive control actions. Legislators are proposing a significant decrease in the fine for illegally killing wolves from $4,000 to $1,000 and relisting wolves as a “game” animal instead of endangered. The Yakima County Farm Bureau is opposing the state’s wolf plan outright. Some of their members want all wolves to be eliminated, even though there has only been one confirmed livestock loss to wolves since they returned to Washington more than five years ago.

At least some landowners are taking a more measured approach. Dan Studley, quoted in the Yakima Herald, says he’s not too concerned about wolves:

“(The wolves) came on their own. They weren’t planted,” Studley said. “I look at them like the bear and the cougar and the elk and everything else around us. They’re just wildlife. I don’t oppose them at all. If they became a problem and (state officials) had to trap some and movement, then they’ll do that.

“I just don’t see that they’re going to impact our lives that much.”

As the story points out, Defenders has already chipped in $15,000 in start-up funds to help Washington get a compensation program off the ground. We are also organizing another series of workshops to help local, state, federal and tribal wildlife managers enhance their skills in field investigations and nonlethal deterrents.

Montana county considers wolf bounty – This week, anti-wolf zealots in Jefferson County, Montana are pushing to reinstate a wolf bounty program that would pay people for killing wolves. Only three cattle were lost to wolves in Jefferson County in 2011 according to state compensation payment records, but rather than taking steps to learn to live with wolves, county commissioners are considering a bounty to encourage all wolves to be killed. But not all residents of Jefferson County are on board with the proposed bounty. One hunter, quoted in the local paper, said that the state should be given a chance to manage wolves responsibly before counties take more aggressive action. Another person suggested that cougars and coyotes are likely taking more elk calves and fawns than wolves are, and another said bounties often amount to legalized fraud. Read more in the Helena Independent Record.

Wood River overseas – This summer we were lucky enough to have Pete Haswell, a young biologist from the UK Wolf Conservation Trust, volunteering on the Wood River Wolf Project. He spent his days and nights with our field team tracking wolves and sheep through the central Idaho wilderness, and when he returned, he had some great stories to tell. One night he came within 60 feet of a wolf in the Phantom Hill pack and exchanged late night howls with other packs as well. More importantly, he got to learn first-hand about the nonlethal tools we use to deter wolf attacks, which he hopes to utilize in his work in Eastern Europe. Pete also created an interactive map to keep track of known wolf locations in relation to grazing bands of sheep. Read more about Pete’s adventures in Idaho in the latest issue of Wolf Print, the quarterly magazine of UKWCT (see pg. 14). Pete also wrote a blog post for Defenders during Wolf Awareness Week.

Video of OR7 in his Oregon days – While OR7 remains in northern California in the shadows of Mt. Lassen, his legend continues to spread. This week a video surfaced of the lone male wolf from his Oregon days. The goal of the group named “Oregon Wolf Education” that sponsored the video is “to educate people on how the recent invasion of the Canadian gray wolf is affecting our lives.” But the video also tells a different story of a lone wolf that repeatedly moved through cattle pastures without causing trouble, due at least in part to the effective use of a range rider. Decide for yourself whether the short video portrays OR7 as a serious threat or just another wild animal sharing the landscape:

OR-7 from Pahsimeroi Pictures on Vimeo.

And in case you missed it, OR7 has also made news in the New York Times and TIME magazine!

What does the data show? – Understanding wolf behavior and their interactions with both wild ungulates and livestock isn’t easy. Wolves share the landscape with other animals that target the same prey, so it takes some careful analysis to determine the impact of any one species on another. That’s why Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks is leading an in-depth study of predator-prey interactions in the Bitterroot Valley, where elk herds have declined in recent years. There are two years remaining in the study, but so far state biologists are learning that cougars in the area may be having a bigger impact on elk populations than wolves (last year, cougars killed 13 tagged elk calves and wolves killed three). The results of the study should yield important information about the relative impact of wolves on elk. Read more in this feature story from the Missoula Independent.

Bookmark and Share

Posted in Commentary, Features, In the News, Rocky Mountains, Species at Risk, Video, Wolves1 Comment

Wolf, (c) James Brandenburg / National Geographic Stock

Taxes For Idaho Aerial Wolf Killing

Stop the Idaho Aerial Wolf Slaughter Plan

Idaho's wolves are in the crosshairs. You can help save them. Please take action now!

Will your tax dollars pay for an ill-conceived aerial wolf cull in Northeastern Idaho – an unscientific plan to boost game populations that could kill as many as two thirds of the wolves in the Lolo District of the Clearwater National Forest?

Tell President Obama to stop aerial wolf killing in Idaho before it starts. Send your message right now.

The Idaho Fish and Game Commission has asked federal officials at Wildlife Services to use helicopters, sharpshooters and your tax dollars to find, target and kill most of the wolves in this wild area of Idaho.

President Obama can save these wolves. He need only direct Wildlife Services to deny Idaho’s request.

Ask President Obama to stop Wildlife Services from spending federal tax dollars on this ill-conceived aerial wolf killing plan designed to artificially boost game populations.

The wolf killing could begin within days – on our National Forests and paid for with your tax dollars – so please send your message now.

When President Obama took office in 2009, he promised to put science first in the management of America’s wildlife and natural resources. Now he has a chance to do just that by rejecting Idaho’s request for federal resources to kill wolves.

The President need only recognize the importance of ensuring sustainable populations of these ecologically important and iconic animals and reject Idaho’s attempts to artificially boost game numbers.

If we’re going to stop this wasteful wolf cull, President Obama needs to hear from as many caring people as possible. Please send your message today and help us send at least 75,000 messages to the White House by the end of the week.

Speak out for wolves and against using federal tax dollars to kill wolves in Idaho. Send your message now.

Bookmark and Share

Posted in Features, Rocky Mountains, Species at Risk, Take Action, Wolves0 Comments

Wolf, (c) Richard Seeley / National Geographic Stock

Wolf Weekly Wrap-up

Gibbon pack in Yellowstone. Photo courtesy of U.S. National Park Service.

When the weather breaks – Some bad weather passing through Idaho may be the only thing keeping 50 wolves alive in the Lolo zone of Clearwater National Forest. Idaho Fish and Game officials have said the state is ready to move forward with plans to remove up to two-thirds of the wolves in the area by aerial gunning, just as soon as the weather improves. The aerial gunning plan was approved by the Idaho Fish and Game Commission at its December meeting and will be carried out by federal agents with Wildlife Services, a division of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Hunters and trappers have already killed at least 260 wolves so far this season, yet the state is still targeting more wolves in order to boost elk numbers for hunters. We’re pushing the state to abandon this unwarranted and unscientific wolf-killing plan. We’re also calling on the Obama administration to reform Wildlife Services and stop wasting precious tax dollars to artificially boost game populations. American taxpayers shouldn’t be asked to subsidize hunters. It’s time for Idaho to start managing wolves responsibly as they manage other wildlife instead of trying to kill as many wolves as possible.

Crossing a line – Defenders isn’t the only group expressing concerns over Montana’s proposal to extend the wolf hunt in the Bitterroot Valley until April 1. Two members of the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Commission voted against the proposal. Commissioner Ron Moody has taken it a step further by openly criticizing the proposal, which he says would cross the line of ethical fair-chase hunting. Hunters aren’t typically allowed to shoot animals during their reproductive season when pregnant mothers are relatively defenseless. He also points out that wolves are just one of many factors that have reduced the size of the elk herd in the Bitterroot. He says bad winters, over-harvest of cow elk in prior years, others predators and habitat fragmentation have all conspired against elk.

“You can’t single out the wolf, and say, well, we’ll eradicate the wolves and that will fix the problem,” he said. “If you eradicate the wolves, you’d probably have one less excuse for what the real problems are.”

Listen to a feature interview with Moody on Montana Public Radio (jump to the 9-minute mark):

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

In a column titled “Hatred of predators reaches ridiculous fervor,” Nick Gevock at the Montana Standard also laments the kill-all-the-wolves mentality en vogue across much of Montana. He writes:

“Do wolves, bears, mountain lions and other predators kill game? Of course they do, and they should be managed to sustain and yet control their populations using sound science, not hysteria.
In the early 20th century, we tried predator control as a cure-all to boost game numbers. It failed, because it didn’t take into account the myriad of factors that go into sustaining healthy wildlife numbers.”

“The Grey” area between fact and fiction – Though we’re still hoping “The Grey” will flop at the box office, the movie continues to garner attention for its sensational (and violent) portrayal of wolves. Our wolf expert Suzanne Stone explained to Greenwire why even fictional tales can do wolves a disservice:

“This kind of misrepresentation of the nature of wolves leads to a lot of confusion and fear of the species, which can drive their politics and management… Movies like ‘The Grey’ are fueling anti-wolf sentiments in popular culture at a crucial time for wolf recovery.”

Case in point: in the same article, Rep. Rob Bishop (R-Utah) perpetuates the ridiculous myth that wolves eat children. That’s just the kind of irrational fear that anti-wolf extremists are only too eager to spread. Now “The Grey” is making their job easier.

 

Bookmark and Share

Posted in Audio, Experts, Features, In the News, Rocky Mountains, Species at Risk, Wolves0 Comments

Wolf, (c) Gary Schultz, NGSDefenders of Wildlife leads the pack when it comes to protecting wild animals and plants in their natural communities.

www.defenders.org

Archives

Bookmark and Share